Global Data: insurance comparison websites must evolve their models to improve clarity
Insurance price comparison websites must evolve their models to improve clarity for customers, says research and consulting firm GlobalData.
Global Data’s latest report says the popularity of comparison sites is closely tied to the ebb and flow of rate movement driving shop-around behaviour.
Rate movement sits behind the positive figures reported for each of the “big four” sites for 2016: Comparethemarket.com, Confused.com, Gocompare.com, and Moneysupermarket.com.
For example, both Confused.com and Moneysupermarket.com saw a 14% bump in revenue in 2016, driven by a pricing environment that is set to continue.
Premiums for car insurance – still the primary insurance market for comparison sites – continue to rise due to a combination of factors.
The shift in the Ogden discount rate sent a huge wave through the market but only adds to the existing impact of increasing tax rates on insurance, claims inflation for parts sourced abroad, and enduring issues with claims such as whiplash.
Indeed, Brexit and the upcoming election will drive these issues as the pound remains weak and claims legislation will likely be slow to emerge.
Stewart McEwan, GlobalData’s head of content for UK General Insurance, says: “At a time where shopping around is set to be at a peak, these sites provide an invaluable service to help customers compare and seek the best deal. However, there are a few key areas in which service providers could afford to give consumers more clarity.
“Firstly, analysis conducted in March 2017 of quotes received across each of the big four price comparison sites for an ’average driver’ revealed that the average price across the top 10 quotes can differ quite significantly between sites – to the tune of £87 in this example.”
To some extent Global Data said this situation is inevitable between competing services. However, clarity lacks when there are price differences between each site for the same insurer.
McEwan continues: “Consumers may set their preferred level of voluntary excess on each site, but the level of compulsory excess then added varies from quote to quote. While clearly displaying the excess, none of the big four have built a system to balance the overall excess across the quote board. This means customers are not viewing quotes on an ’apples-to-apples’ basis.”